already one of the most acclaimed books of 2017
“Fascinating. . . . Perfect for fans of Antonio Damasio’s Descartes’ Error.”
— Library Journal
“Davis engagingly explores how sophisticated brain studies might help explain the causes of violent crimes. . . . A thoroughly researched, clearly presented book.”
— Kirkus (starred review)
“The Brain Defense is the best kind of nonfiction: It tells you what you need to know, not merely what you want to know. Kevin Davis delivers a riveting journey down an important new corridor in the American courthouse. An important book.”
— Michael Connelly
“A brave and thoughtful exploration of an intractable problem: What role, if any, should neuroscience play in the courtroom? Kevin Davis’s informative book will contribute significantly to the national dialogue on this controversial issue.”
— Antonio Damasio
“The Brain Defense is a stirring ride into a fascinating new field. Can a tumor or traumatic brain injury explain rape or murder? Can they diminish culpability? If your instinct screams no, read page one. The first staggering case will challenge your assumptions; the book that follows may alter them permanently. The vividness and urgency of Kevin Davis’s storytelling, along with his artful touch, draw you in from the first line and never let you go.”
— Dave Cullen
A riveting journey down a new corridor in the American courthouse. An important book.
— Michael Connelly
Murder in Manhattan
In 1991, the police were called to East 72nd St. in Manhattan, where a woman’s body had fallen from a twelfth-story window. The woman’s husband, Herbert Weinstein, soon confessed to having hit and strangled his wife after an argument, then dropping her body out of their apartment window to make it look like a suicide. The 65-year-old Weinstein, a quiet, unassuming retired advertising executive, had no criminal record, no history of violent behavior — not even a short temper. How, then, to explain this horrific act?
Journalist Kevin Davis uses the perplexing story of the Weinstein murder to present a riveting, deeply researched exploration of the intersection of neuroscience and criminal justice. Shortly after Weinstein was arrested, an MRI revealed a cyst the size of an orange on his brain’s frontal lobe, the part of the brain that governs judgment and impulse control. Weinstein’s lawyer seized on that discovery, arguing that the cyst had impaired Weinstein’s judgment and that he should not be held criminally responsible for the murder. It was the first case in the United States in which a judge allowed a scan showing a defendant’s brain activity to be admitted as evidence to support a claim of innocence.
The Weinstein case marked the dawn of a new era in America’s courtrooms, raising complex and often troubling questions about how we define responsibility and free will, how we view the purpose of punishment, and how strongly we are willing to bring scientific evidence to bear on moral questions.
Davis brings to light not only the intricacies of the Weinstein case but also the broader history linking brain injuries and aberrant behavior, from the bizarre stories of Phineas Gage and Charles Whitman, perpetrator of the 1966 Texas Tower Sniper Massacre, to the role that brain damage may play in violence carried out by football players and troubled veterans of America’s twenty-first century wars.
The Weinstein case opened the door for a novel defense that continues to transform the legal system. Criminal lawyers are increasingly turning to neuroscience and new technologies like MRIs to introduce the effects of brain injuries into the courtroom. Some are caused by trauma or by tumors, cancer, or drug or alcohol abuse, with new diagnoses like CTE and TBI, as well as PTSD. Lawyers argue that brain damage should be considered in determining guilt or innocence, the death penalty or years behind bars. As he takes stock of the past, present and future of neuroscience in the courts, Davis offers a powerful account of its potential and its hazards.
Thought-provoking and brilliantly crafted, The Brain Defense marries a true crime murder mystery complete with colorful characters and courtroom drama with a sophisticated discussion of how our legal system has changed — and must continue to change — as we broaden our understanding of the human mind.
Curious Brain Abnormalities
From The Brain Defense
The Brain Defense is the first comprehensive examination of the confluence of neuroscience and brain abnormalities with courtrooms and the legal system by a veteran crime journalist. It is destined to be a true crime classic.
The book opens with the Herbert Weinstein murder case, but also delves into fascinating cases like Texas Tower Sniper Charles Whitman in Austin, and Phineas Gage, the railroad worker who miraculously survived an iron spike driven through his head, but with puzzling change to his personality.
The Brain Defense explores the role of MRIs in diagnosing and treating PTSD (Post Traumatic Brain Disorder), CTE (Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy), and TBI Traumatic Brain Injury, as well as tumors, cancer, or genetic abnormality.
Charles Whitman, the sniper in the infamous 1966 Texas Tower Massacre at the University of Texas in Austin. Following his death, an autopsy revealed a small tumor deep inside his brain.
Railroad worker Phineas Gage, posing with the iron spike driven through his head. He called "my constant companion."
Diagram of Phineas Gage's skull, indicating the path of the iron railroad spike driven through his head.
Barbara and Herbert Weinstein circa 1988. Weinstein had no idea there was an orange size cyst growing in the left frontal lobe of his brain - a medical condition he later claimed caused him to kill Barbara.
An MRI and a PET scan image of Weinstein's brain show the dark area where the orange sized sub-arachnoid cyst had grown.
In chapter two of the Brain Defense, I misidentified Antoinette R. McGarrahan’s job title. McGarrahan is a psychologist who specializes in forensic psychology and neuropsychology and not a mitigation specialist. McGarrahan is sometimes hired by defense lawyers to independently evaluate their clients for mitigation purposes in death penalty cases